"We set out on a mission to show if you treat patients with the doses that were used in the clinical trials, they will do better," says Jeffrey Goldberger. "We expected to see patients treated with the lower doses to have worse survival. We were shocked to discover they survived just as well, and possibly even better." (Credit: C x 2/Flickr)
Heart attack patients treated with a substantially lower dosage of beta-blockers survive at the same—or in some cases an even better—rate than patients on higher doses.
In fact, a new study shows that patients who receive one-fourth of the original clinical trial dose had up to a 20 to 25 percent decrease in mortality compared to the full dose group.
About 90 percent of patients who have had a heart attack currently receive beta-blockers, a class of drug commonly prescribed to improve survival and prevent future heart attacks. Beta-blockers block the effects of adrenaline on the heart, reduce irregular heartbeat (arrhythmia), and help prevent heart failure.
No one was more surprised at the results than lead investigator Jeffrey Goldberger, professor of medicine in cardiology at Northwestern University. He launched the study when he discovered heart attack patients were being treated with much lower doses of beta-blockers than were used in clinical trials.
“I thought that was terrible quality of care,” says Goldberger. “We set out on a mission to show if you treat patients with the doses that were used in the clinical trials, they will do better. We expected to see patients treated with the lower doses to have worse survival. We were shocked to discover they survived just as well, and possibly even better.”
He says new research should be conducted to determine the most appropriate beta-blocker dose for individual patients to get the optimal benefit. The earlier clinical trials did not assess the effects of different doses.
Patients are treated with lower doses for a variety of reasons. There may be concern about possible side effects that may include fatigue, sexual dysfunction, and depression. In addition, when patients are started on conservative, low doses in the hospital after a heart attack, they return home so quickly, there is little time to adjust the dosage.
The new study, published in the
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, examined data in a multicenter registry on 6,682 patients who had a heart attack. About 90 percent were receiving beta-blockers. All the patients on beta-blockers survived longer than those who did not receive the drugs. The raw, unadjusted data showed that of the people who received the full dose, 14.7 percent died within two years; of those receiving the half dose, 12.9 percent died; for the quarter dose, 9.5 percent died; and for the one-eighth dose, 11.5 percent died.
OBTAIN (Outcomes of Beta-Blocker Therapy After Myocardial Infarction) is an observational multicenter registry in which beta-blocker dosing information was collected in patients with an acute heart attack at participating centers to assess the effect of dose on survival.
“There is probably not one right dose for every single patient,” Goldberger says. “It doesn’t make sense that the same dose will work for an 80-year-old frail man who had a small heart attack as a burly 40-year-old man with a huge heart attack.
“We now need to figure out how to dose it in individual patients. That’s something no one has considered in the decades that we have been using this medication. This huge gap in knowledge has been completely unexplored. Since this is medicine we use in every single heart attack patient, we ought to figure out how to use it properly.”
The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health supported the work.
Source:
Northwestern University
This article was originally published on
futurity.org.
